About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

56 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 1 (2025)

handle is hein.journals/gwilr56 and id is 1 raw text is: 









     FIGHT AT THE MUSEUM: WHY THE UNITED KINGDOM
     SHOULD AMEND SECTION 5 OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM
                                                              ACT   1963


                                                              Tara Rosen*



                               ABSTRACT
       The British Museum  Act 1963 and  the British Museum have been
     the center of controversy in the global art repatriation movement, facing
     criticism from other nations and international organizations. Modern
     trends towards recognizing and legitimizing repatriation claims have
     influenced museums across the world to collaborate and negotiate with
     formerly colonized nations to bring culturally significant artifacts
     home.  The United Kingdom   has failed to hop on the international
     bandwagon,  with their position on repatriation being no returns
     regardless of whether the British Museum has bona fide ownership. The
     British Museum Act does not permit trustees of the British Museum to
     dispose of any objects because of strict fiduciary duty laws. The U.K.
     Parliament has the power to change the law to reflect the sentiment of
     the international community. This Note argues that, despite a long
     history of convoluted repatriation law, the U.K. Parliament may-
     and should-amend   the British Museum Act to lay out exceptions for
     genuine, legally-supported repatriation claims.

                          I.  INTRODUCTION

   In 1897, British forces violently invaded Benin  and  wreaked  havoc
upon   its community,1  burning   the  palace and  banishing   the Oba,
Benin's  king.2  In addition  to stealing lives and dignity, the  British
military looted  countless  Beninese   artifacts, which resulted  in not
only a loss of physical and  economic property, but history and cul-
ture as well.3 It is true that when  historical artifacts are taken from


    *  J.D. 2024, The George Washington University Law School; B.A. 2021, State
University of New York at Binghamton.
    1. See Emily Duthie, The British Museum: An Imperial Museum in a Post-Imperial World, 18
PUB. HIST. REv. 12, 17 (2011); Home Box Office, Museums: Last Week Tonight withJohn Oliver
(HBO), YouTUBE, at 05:53 (Oct. 3, 2022), https://youtu.be/eJPLiT1kCSM [https://perma.
cc/DV9N-NDPX].
    2. Jane Clinton, Cambridge University to Return over 100 Looted Benin Bronzes to Nigeria,
GUARDIAN (Dec. 14, 2022, 18:39), https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2022/dec/14/
cambridge-university-to-return-over-100-looted-benin-bronzes-to-nigeria [https://perma.
cc/9L44-RL3A].
    3. See Home Box Office, supra note 1, at 06:26, 07:07.


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most