About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

29 Griffith L. Rev. 1 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/griffith29 and id is 1 raw text is: GRIFFITH LAW REVIEW Routledce 2020, VOL. 29, NO. 1, 1-4 https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2020.1868626 Taylor & Francis Group INTRODUCTION Introduction to the Griffith Law Review Commission of Inquiry special issue Eugene Schofield-Georgeson and Thalia Anthony University of Technology Sydney These introductory remarks outline the themes and articles that comprise this special issue of the Griffith Law Review on 'Commissions of Inquiry'. The guest editors explain how the work collected in this issue draws on a rich interdisciplinary scholarship and critical analysis to reveal both the prospects as well as limitations of such inquiries. The articles tackle issues ranging from banking and finance capitalism, to child sexual abuse; as well as First Nations' experiences of imprisonment, deaths in custody and set- tler colonial violence; and international Truth and Reconciliation Commissions. In late 2020, Victoria's First Peoples' Assembly won Government support for a First Nations truth and justice commission. One of the early observations by Professor Gre- gory Phillips, a Waanyi-Jaru man, was the need for a genuine truth-telling process along- side national healing and substantive justice.' This is a sobering message and made with reference to the limits of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, especially in relation to its failure to deliver on justice. All too often, commissions of inquiry and truth-telling processes have good intentions but are hamstrung by legal and bureaucratic requirements and a lack of government will to follow-through with implementing the fullness of recommendations. By 2021, the failures of government to implement core recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody year have come to be regarded as contributing to the subsequent 474 First Nations deaths in custody.2 This special issue of Griffith Law Review on Commissions of Inquiry discusses the strengths and weaknesses of inquiries. At best, they enable stories of the marginalised and oppressed to be heard, heal and strengthen survivors and provide a mechanism for justice to be delivered. At worst, they are a decoy for government action and retrau- matise survivors. The analyses of the inquiries examined in this collection demonstrate the need to learn from the successes and failures of commissions of inquiry of this kind. The articles convey the substantial scope for inquiries to provide more meaningful outcomes for survivors and public policy. To do this, those responsible for wrongs and crimes need to be held accountable. Yet rarely does this occur in adequate measure. This failure curtails the capacity of inquiries to make amends through reconciliation and CONTACT Eugene Schofield-Georgeson Eugene.Schofield-Georgeson@uts.edu.au - University of Technology Sydney 'What Australia's first Aboriginal truth and justice commission might look like', ABC News, 12 December 2020, https:// www.abc.net.au/news/2020-12-12/australian-aboriginal-truth-and-justice-commission-what-is-it/ 2956326. 2Anthony et al. (2021). © 2021 Griffith University

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most