About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

138 Harv. L. Rev. F. 1 (2024-2025)

handle is hein.journals/forharoc138 and id is 1 raw text is: 









                ORIGINALISM'S AGE OF IRONIES

                               Sherif  Girgis*

    Guns,  abortion,  religious establishments,  presidential power:   While
today's  Supreme   Court  identifies as originalist, it has settled constitu-
tional questions  on these and  many   other issues using history and  tradi-
tion, not just original meaning.1  Scholars  debate  whether  this trend can
be squared   with originalism.2  Last  Term,  the originalist Justices them-
selves joined the fray. Their  reflections might  foreshadow   the reasoning
and  outcomes   of future cases, including on hot-button  issues.  So a close
look should  pay  off for parties hunting for five votes on  a methodologi-
cally self-conscious Court.  It should interest citizens keen to know  if the
Court  abides  by  its principles and wondering where those might lead.
And  a close look delivers theoretical insights. It makes  vivid  how  easily
the original meaning of the text runs out in Supreme Court cases, re-
quiring  constitutional construction3  to bridge  the gap  between   vague
meaning   and   specific outcomes. It reveals the divergent paths that
originalists take when   the method   is pressed  to its limits, casting light
on  originalism's deepest  motivations   and  challenges.  It turns out  that
in such  cases, the purer one's  originalism at the level of theory, the less
it constrains judges  in practice.
    Part I of this Essay distinguishes  originalism and  traditionalism  and
describes  the Court's apparent   turn to the latter.
    Part  II addresses   traditionalism   in separation   of  powers   cases.
While   Justices  Kavanaugh and Barrett disagreed this Term about


   * Associate Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School. I thank Joel Alicea, Rishabh Bhandari,
Sam Bray, Rick Garnett, Bill Kelley, Stefan McDaniel, Jeff Pojanowski, Reva Siegel, and Garrett
West for helpful feedback or discussions.
   1 See, e.g., Seila L. LLC v. CFPB, 140 S. Ct. 2183, 2202 (2020). See generally Randy E. Barnett
& Lawrence B. Solum, Originalism After Dobbs, Bruen, and Kennedy: The Role of History and
Tradition, 118 NW. U. L. REV. 433 (2023) (analyzing potential examples).
   2 See generally Barnett & Solum, supra note 1, at 446 (arguing that history and tradition can
be used as evidence of original meaning and purpose, consistent with public meaning originalism);
Marc O. DeGirolami, Traditionalism Rising, 24 J. CONTEMP. LEGAL ISSUES 9 (2023) (distinguish-
ing traditionalism from originalism); Sherif Girgis, Living Traditionalism, 98 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1477
(2023) (arguing that the Court's reliance on political practices arising long after ratification is hard
to square with originalism).
   3 See Randy E. Barnett & Evan D. Bernick, The Letter and the Spirit: A Unified Theory of
Originalism, 107 GEO. L.J. 1, 10 (2018) (citing KEITH E. WHITTINGTON, CONSTITUTIONAL
INTERPRETATION: TEXTUAL  MEANING,  ORIGINAL INTENT, AND JUDICIAL REVIEW (1999);
KEITH  E. WHITTINGTON,  CONSTITUTIONAL   CONSTRUCTION:  DIVIDED  POWERS  AND
CONSTITUTIONAL  MEANING   (1999)) (describing the distinction between (a) endeavoring to as-
certain the communicative content of constitutional text and (b) making constitutional judgments
when that endeavor fails to yield a single determinate answer and calling the latter task construc-
tion); see also id. at 35 (arguing that judges in cases requiring construction specify ... an imple-
menting doctrine . . . consistent with the . . . original function of the relevant constitutional norm
(footnote omitted)).


I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most