About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

28 Emp. Rts. & Emp. Pol'y J. 1 (2025)

handle is hein.journals/emplrght28 and id is 1 raw text is: 







     Undue Hardship after Groff

                      By  Dallan F. Flake*

        Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires an
    employer to accommodate an employee whose religious beliefs
    or practices conflict with work requirements unless doing so
    would  impose  undue  hardship  on  the  conduct  of the
    employer's business.Courts have long permitted employers to
    prove undue  hardship  based  on how  an  accommodation
    impacts other workers. But in Groff v. DeJoy, the Supreme
    Court  turned  this longstanding  practice on   its head,
    mandating  that an  employer must  now  take the further
    logical step of proving how an accommodation's impact on
    coworkers in turn negatively affects the business itself.
        This new  requirement  is a  mistake. Not  only is it
    impractical, but it is also unnecessary. Social science research
    has long  confirmed an  unequivocal  link between worker
    morale and a host of organizational outcomes. When coworker
    morale decreases because of accommodation,  organizations
    pay a hefty price. Low morale is associated with increased
    absenteeism, burnout, and turnover, as well as with decreased
    productivity and  organizational citizenship. Because the
    relationship between low morale  and  poor organizational
    outcomes is not subject to reasonable dispute, courts should
    take judicial notice that an accommodation that adversely
    impacts coworkers has  an adverse impact  on the business
    itself, thus obviating the need for employers to comply with the
    Court's ill-advised new evidentiary requirement.

                        I. INTRODUCTION

    Suppose a factory worker converts to a religion that requires him
to no longer work  on Sundays  in observance of his Sabbath. The

   * Associate Dean of Faculty Scholarship and Associate Professor of Law,
Gonzaga University School of Law. Special thank you to Nicole Buonocore Porter
and the Martin Malin Institute for Law and the Workplace at Chicago-Kent
College of Law for organizing this symposium, to the audience at the 2024 Law
and Society Association Annual Meeting for helpful comments and suggestions,
and to Caroline Witherspoon for her research assistance.


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most