About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

74 Emory L.J. 1 (2024-2025)

handle is hein.journals/emlj74 and id is 1 raw text is: 









        THE MISSING MILLIONS: CY PRES IN FEDERAL
                    SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS

                                 Scott Dodson*

                             Joseph A. Grundfest**

                                  ABSTRACT

    Under  prevailing  cy pres doctrine, class-action-settlement residuals that
cannot  efficiently orfairly be distributed to the class may be distributed to a
third party  that represents  the next  best recipient consistent with  class
interests. Judges embrace  cy pres despite theoretical concerns over inattention,
conflicts, and abuse. We shed empirical light on the cy pres debate by examining
an  original, hand-collected  dataset of 373  class-action settlements entered
between   2010  and  2018.  We  document   that the theoretical concerns  have
empirical  merit. More  than 57%   of the settlements lack any evidence  in the
public  record of the identity or court approval  of cy pres  recipients. At an
average   cy  pres  award   of  around  $20,000,   we  estimate  the  value  of
unaccounted-for  residuals in allfederal securities class-action settlements since
1996  as exceeding $25  million. Among  identified cy pres recipients, most have
little or no relationship to interests of the class, and we find some evidence of
conflicts of interest. These findings raise concerns about potential breaches of
fiduciary duty and  noncompliance   with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  We
suggest  that these deficiencies are caused by a combination of self-interest and
inattention on the part ofplaintiff's counsel, leadplaintiffs, and the courts. We
also offer solutions to remediate these deficiencies. Prospectively, we propose
presumptions   for  the selection of  appropriate  recipients of  the residual,
mandatory   disclosure  of conflicts, and prior judicial  approval  of cy pres
distributions. Retrospectively, we urge  courts to order disclosure of missing
information  and to consider appropriate  disciplinary measures, contingent on
the information disclosed.



      James Edgar Hervey Chair in Litigation, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr. Distinguished Professor of Law, and
Director of the Center for Litigation and Courts, University of California Law, San Francisco.
      W.A. Franke Professor of Law and Business, Emeritus, Stanford Law School, and Senior Faculty, Arthur
and Toni Rembe Rock Center for Corporate Governance. Our thanks to Nora Engstrom, Rick Marcus, Adam
Zimmerman, and others who offered comments during our presentation of this paper at the Ninth Annual Civil
Procedure Workshop at UC Law SF. We also are grateful to Gal Dor for her tireless and meticulous assistance.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most