About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

73 Clev. St. L. Rev. Et Cetera 1 (2024-2025)

handle is hein.journals/cvdstlw73 and id is 1 raw text is: CLEVELAND STATE LAW REVIEW ET CETERA VOLUME 73 NOVEMBER 19, 2024 PAGES 1-18 THE LAST WORD ON THE OHIO CONSTITUTION STEVEN H. STEINGLASS* & GINO J. SCARSELLI.** THE OHIO STATE CONSTITUTION, 2D ED. (NEW YORK: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2022). XXIX + 661 PP. REVIEWED BY JONATHAN L. ENTINf CONTENTS I. JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE......................................... 4 II. THE JUDICIARY AND THE POLITICAL BRANCHES ........................................... 6 III. SEPARATION OF POW ERS ............................................................................ 10 IV . R ACE AND G ENDER ...................................................................................... 13 V. THE NEW JUDICIAL FEDERALISM ................................................................ 15 VI. AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION................................................................... 16 * Dean Emeritus and Professor Emeritus, Cleveland State University College of Law. See also STEVEN H. STEINGLASS, SECTION 1983 LITIGATION IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS (2023- 2024 ed. 2023). Dean Steinglass argued two important civil rights cases in the U.S. Supreme Court and was on the briefs in a third. See Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 565 (1972) (arguing a leading procedural due process case on behalf of an untenured state university professor whose contract was not renewed after the professor criticized the administration's response to student protests); Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131, 133 (1988) (arguing on behalf of an arrestee in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case holding that a state notice-of-claim statute was preempted); Howlett ex rel. Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356, 358 (1990) (appearing on the briefs on behalf of a former high school student who sued school officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in a case holding that a defense of sovereign immunity was not available in state court when that defense would not be available had the case been brought in federal court). ** Member of the Ohio bar. See, e.g., Chapman v. Higbee Co., 319 F.3d 825, 827 (6th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (serving as counsel for amicus curiae supporting a successful plaintiff arguing that 42 U.S.C. § 1981 prohibits private racial discrimination); Junger v. Daley, 209 F.3d 481, 482 (6th Cir. 2000) (representing the successful plaintiff in a case holding that the First Amendment protects computer code); see also Gino J. Scarselli, Tribute to Peter Junger, 58 CASE W. RSRV. L. REV. 325 (2008). t David L. Brennan Professor Emeritus of Law, Case Western Reserve University. 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most