About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

14 Creighton Int'l & Comp. L.J. 1 (2024)

handle is hein.journals/creintcl14 and id is 1 raw text is: 







     GLOBAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE APPLIED TO THE WAR
     IN UKRAINE: A LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR U.S.-LED
           INTERNATIONAL AD HOC TRIBUNALS

                         Patrick S. Trinidad *

                                 Abstract
    The present study focuses on  U.S.-led efforts to create an ad hoc
international tribunal for the War in Ukraine. The aim of this paper was to
outline three main requirements that must be met for such a tribunal to be
formed:  U.S. legal authority, international legal authority, and Ukrainian
constitutional authority. This paper explored the power of the U.S. Executive
Branch  in foreign affairs, legal frameworks from the Nuremberg Trials, and
the  Ukrainian  Constitution in  order to  better understand  how   an
international ad hoc tribunal can be implemented in Ukraine. As a result, it
was  determined that the U.S. President possesses high levels of authority
regarding  the creation of ad hoc tribunals; legal frameworks from the
Nuremberg  Trials can be applied to an international ad hoc tribunal for the
War  in Ukraine; and such a tribunal can be established while respecting the
constitutional sovereignty of Ukraine.

INTRODUCTION.........................................................................1
I. U.S. GLOBAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN THE 21sT CENTURY ..................... 7
II. LEGAL FOUNDATION  FOR MODERN  AD  Hoc TRIBUNALS  ...................11
III. U.S.-LED INTERNATIONALAD Hoc  TRIBUNALS  IN UKRAINE ................20
CONCLUSION................................. ......... .. ...... ...... ....24

                            INTRODUCTION
    The United  States historically has been at the forefront of enforcing
global justice since the 20h Century. In fact, the U.S. was the leader of post-
WWII   international tribunals such as the one found in Nuremberg.1 However,
the U.S. has adopted a rather unipolar approach to global accountability in
the 21St century.2 Unfortunately, the world has only grown in complexity
since the 20h century, forcing the U.S. to revert from its unipolar approach to

    * J.D. and M.S. candidate at Creighton University School of Law (2024); M.A., The
University of Texas at El Paso (2021); B.A., The University of Texas at Austin (2020). The
author is responsible for any errors in this publication. For any comments, please email
patrick inidad@creighton.edu or patricktrinidad@utexas.edu.
    1 Joseph Brunner, American Involvement in the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial Process,
 1 MICH. J. HISTORY, no. 2, 2002.
    2 Charles Krauthammer, The Unipolar Moment Revisited, THE NAT'L INT. (Dec. 1,
2002), httys://nationalinterestonjarticle/the-unipolar-moment-revisited-391.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most