About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

16 Colum. J. Tax L. 1 (2024-2025)

handle is hein.journals/colujoutl16 and id is 1 raw text is: THE REALIZATION RULE AS A LEGAL STANDARD Sloan G. Speck* Abstract The realization rule in tax law is better characterized as a legal standard. This characterization matters after the Supreme Court's decision in Moore v. United States, which sets the stage forfuture courts to decide that the Constitution mandates realization an identifiable event before accrued income is reportable by taxpayers. The stakes of a constitutional realization requirement are underappreciated. Because current statutory law embeds realization as a background principle, a constitutional realization requirement would operate as a taxpayer-initiated antiabuse doctrine -a sword that taxpayers could use selectively to invalidate parts ofthe Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations. This novel constitutional tool has adverse, and underappreciated, implications for the U.S. tax system's structure and complexity. Through the lens of the longstanding academic literature on legal rules and standards, the dangers of a constitutional realization requirement extend beyond top-down risks to individual Internal Revenue Code provisions or, as the Moore majority posited, entire taxing regimes. Instead, a constitutional realization requirement threatens to erode federal income tax law from the bottom up, through incremental public and private challenges to the fundamental mechanics of taxation. Realization and nonrealization permeate business entity taxation in deeply technical ways. In these areas, a constitutional realization requirement may facilitate aggressive private planning, undermine the law 's coherence, and dampen reform efforts. Even Moore's whisper of a constitutional realization requirement ventures into poorly charted territory, with potentially detrimental consequences that may prove difficult to unwind. Moreover, a constitutional realization requirementportends increased complexity in tax law. Government-asserted antiabuse doctrines constrain complexity by allowing lawmakers to write simpler rules that cover high-frequency transactions. Low-frequency transactions, including those that reflect inappropriate tax planning, are addressed through (and discouraged by) open-ended standards in the enforcement process. As a taxpayer-initiated antiabuse doctrine, a constitutional realization requirement would have the reverse effect, increasing complexity by increasing the frequency of tax-planned transactions, encouraging more costly government responses to taxpayer abuse, and changing the dynamics of enforcement. The resulting complexity would be systemic and could increase over time. * Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado Law School. Thanks to Sam Astorga, Rabea Benhalim, Jonathan Booth, David Elkins, Ari Glogower, Kate Goldfarb, Amanda Parsons, Blake Reid, and participants at the Sixth Annual UCI Law-Taylor Nelson Amitrano LLP Tax Symposium and National Tax Association's 117th Annual Conference on Taxation for helpful comments and discussion.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most