About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

9 Comp. Legal Hist. 1 (2021)

handle is hein.journals/clehory9 and id is 1 raw text is: Comparative Legal History, 2021                               ) Routledge
Vol. 9, No. 1, 1-2, https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2021.1908929   T*y'°`&hac'°snp
Editorial
This journal invites readers to explore law in different jurisdictions and time
periods. Comparative legal history-as a discipline-takes readers in journeys
across the axes offered by time and space, triggering self-awareness and under-
standing of otherness, alike. The European Society for Comparative Legal
History (ESCLH) takes pride in offering this forum, aiming to foster the study
of the development of legal science, the circulation of legal ideas, and the dialo-
gue that takes place across time and space.
Issue 1 of Volume 9 invites readers to revisit existing understandings, looking
at law and history through novel perspectives. The articles section of this issue
takes readers to explore different parts of the mappa mundi, with special attention
on events that took place during the Middle Ages and early modern period. The
first article, by Tamar Herzog, lays a bridge across the Atlantic Ocean, revisiting
the prior understanding of customs. The author offers an enriching dialogue
between narratives, noting that actors in Europe and the Americas can learn
from each other. The second article, by Paolo Astorri, focusses on European
developments that had an impact across the Christian world. The author studies
Catholic and Lutheran scholars and the decision-making function of judges. Dia-
logues, disputes, and different positions remind readers that law is a social (and
dynamic) science. The third article, by Kiran Chaudhuri, takes readers to
Japan. It looks at developments in criminal law and criminal justice, crossing
from the Middle Ages until the twentieth century. The author depicts the dialogue
of Japanese legal culture with otherness, looking at the circulation of legal ideas
across continents and centuries. The three articles in this issue alert readers that
some understandings are not to be considered uncontested dogmas. There is
indeed value in revisiting prior understandings, while exposure to otherness
can only be beneficial for the disciplinary growth of comparative legal history.
The literature on comparative legal history continues to develop. It is the
result of the work of scholars who look at the law in different times and
spaces. Further, it is nurtured by the publications that derive from academic meet-
ings that take comparative legal history as their main theme. For example, the
ESCLH organizes biennial conferences since 2010, while in recent years com-
parative legal history was the topic of the XXIVth British Legal History Confer-
ence and of the 2020 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Comparative
Law. The literature also grows as the output of research grants awarded to scho-
lars that devote their efforts to comparative legal historical research. This journal
helps to draw attention to recent publications and evaluate their place within the
disciplinary literature particularly through its book reviews section. The first book
review deals with a study of death penalty in Catalonia, placing developments

© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most