About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Armed Forces & Soc'y 7 (1996-1997)

handle is hein.journals/amdfcsad23 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                   Race and Gender

                 in   the U.S. Military


                          DAVID   J. ARMOR





P eriodically,  the demographic  and  social composition of the United
     States armed forces becomes  a national issue. At times the issue is
over access to military service by some group, such as the recent contro-
versy over opening military service to homosexuals. More commonly, the
question of representation is one of degree rather than access. The most
controversial issues with respect to the degree of representation have been
the proportions of blacks and women  in the military. The issue of black
representation flared up during the Persian Gulf war, and the question of
women's   representation was in the news again as a result of major Con-
gressional initiatives to eliminate combat restrictions for women.
    The  controversies over blacks and women  in the military raise quite
different equity and fairness issues. During the troop buildup before the
Persian Gulf War, U.S. defense policies were strongly criticized by such
African American  leaders as Jesse Jackson and Benjamin Hooks.1 While
their main target was the war itself, they complained vigorously about the
fact that the Army troops being sent to the Gulf were nearly 30 percent
black, contrasting with a U.S. population that was only 11 percent black.
This cannon  fodder allegation, that blacks and poor Americans bore an
unfair burden of combat  risks, is not new; it also arose during the Viet-
nam  War.  After the Persian Gulf War, Ronald Walters, Chairman  of the
Political Science Department  at Howard  University, endorsed  specific
quotas to limit blacks in the military to their population proportion.2
    If the controversy about black representation is over the equity of
burden, the debate about women   is over the equity of opportunity. Here

DAVID  J. ARMOR  is a research professor in the Institute of Public Policy at George
Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, where he teaches courses in civil rights policy and
multivariate analysis. He is former Principal Deputy and Acting Assistant Secretary of
Defense (Force Management and Personnel) and author of Forced Justice: School Deseg-
regation and the Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995). Address for correspon-
dence: 5 Sharp Rock Rd., Sperryville, VA 22740.


ARMED  FORCES  & SOCIETY, Vol. 23, No. 1, Fall 1996, pp. 7-27.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most