About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Berkeley J. Afr.-Am. L. & Pol'y 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/afamlpol23 and id is 1 raw text is: 












  The Color of (Juvenile) Justice: Disparate

  Impact and the Congressional Response to

                         the   Pandemic


                         Chris Yarrell*


                               ABSTRACT

     In the wake  of the COVID-19   pandemic,  approximately 55  million
schoolchildren have been compelled to attend school remotely. However, despite
this nationwide shift to virtual schooling, the school-based disparities that long
pre-dated the pandemic have been laid bare and exacerbated. This is painfully
evident in the context of the school-to-prison pipeline (STPP). Indeed, despite
Congress' historic investment in the school recovery effort through the passage
of the CARES Act, recent research confirms that the majority of the states and
localities have devoted scant, if any, federal recovery dollars to dismantling the
STPP.  Without a meaningful commitment by states and localities, our nation's
most vulnerable students will continue to be pushed out of the schoolhouse and
into the criminal legal system. Therefore, a more feasible legal alternative to
dismantle the STPP is needed.
     Despite the treatment that the school recovery effort has received in judicial
opinions and  legal scholarship in response to the pandemic, neither has
undertaken an exhaustive analysis of the school recovery process and its impact
on the STPP. This Article aims to fill that gap. To do so, it makes two broad
claims. First, the Essay provides a timely review of how states and localities have
addressed the STPP with federal recovery aid. Next, it argues that the response
to the pandemic  fails to advance  meaningful  reforms that could begin
dismantling the STPP. Lastly, the Essay contends that, to begin this process,
prospective litigants should leverage the doctrine of stare decisis to overturn
Alexander  v. Sandoval under its unworkability analysis. By overturning
Sandoval, future litigants will again be empowered to remedy disparate impact
discrimination under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In so doing, parents
and students will stand a fighting chance of remedying the disparate educational
harms caused by the STPP in both the near- and long-term.


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most