About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

5 Refugee Reports 1 (1984)

handle is hein.immigration/refgrpt0005 and id is 1 raw text is: 







Ref                     eReports

        A Project of the American Council for Nationalities Service
815 Fifteenth Street NW, Suite 610 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 667-0782


Volume V, Number 1


February 10, 1984


LUNGREN AMENDMENT TRIGGERS CONCERN ABOUT FUTURE OF
U.S. REFUGEE PROGRAM

   A proposed measure that could dramatically shift
the responsibility, direction, and character of the
U.S. refugee program became the subject of debate in
Washington policy circles early this month.
   The measure, the so-called Lungren amendment, calls
for making voluntary agencies legally and financial-
ly responsible for the refugees they resettle in the
U.S.
   Proposed as an attempt to reduce welfare dependency
among refugees, the amendment is strongly supported by
the Reagan administration, which sees the measure as a
way of reducing costs and strengthening the private
ector role in domestic refugee affairs.
   Volags, on the other hand, are in opposition; they
charge that such an amendment would make them exces-
sively liable for situations beyond their control, is
an unfair indictment of current resettlement prac-
tices, and would severely alter the voluntary char-
acter of their work.
   States such as California have voiced concerns,
too. However, according to sources, the Lungren
amendment could have ramifications beyond the current
debate. Reportedly, areas that could be affected by
those ramifications are federal financial support of
the refugee program and U.S. refugee admissions.

Legally and Financially the Crux Although the
controversy over the Lungren amendment has just
recently heated up, the measure has been around for
several months. In November, it was adopted by the
House as part of legislation that would reauthorize
the Refugee Act of 1980 (see Refugee Reports, Vol. IV,
No. 24) after being introduced by Rep. Dan Lungren
(R-Cal.).
   The amendment, which stretches the period for all
volag responsibilities for newly arriving refugees
from 30 days to 90 days, anticipates an increase, too,
n the grants that agencies would receive under their
resettlement contracts with the State Department, and
would take effect six months after passage by
Congress.


IN THIS ISSUE:

An amendment that could have
a significant impact on the
U.S. refugee program--the
Lungren amendment--is the
subject of this issue's fea-
ture story.


Listing of pending legis-
lation .................... 4


* Recent Developments
Push-offs of boat people
cause death, implicate
Thai authorities, and
raise questions about
anti-piracy program;
Salvadoran case could set
precedent ................. 5


* Update
Cooperative agreements
extended; White House
demographic study re-
portedly considers immi-
grants; resource center
closed .................... 7


e Resources


.............7


* Statistics.


Digitized from Best Copy Available

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most