About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-422853,B-422853.2,B-422853.3 Nov 26, 2024 1 (2024-11-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaorgi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                    U.S. GOVERNMENT   ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States
                                              DOCUMENT  FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                           * *a GAO Protective Order. This version has been
Decision                                   approved for public release.


Matter of:   Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.

File:     B-422853; B-422853.2; B-422853.3

Date:     November 26, 2024

Robert J. Symon, Esq., Nathaniel J. Greeson, Esq., Owen E. Salyers, Esq., and Charlie
F. Blanchard, Esq., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, for the protester.
Major Joshua B. Fix, Lieutenant Colonel Anthony V. Lenze, Department of the Army, for
the agency.
Michael P. Price, Esq., and John Sorrenti, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest arguing the agency unreasonably failed to consider evaluation sub-criteria in
priority order of importance is denied. Although the record does not demonstrate that
the agency's evaluation was consistent with the terms of the synopsis, the protester was
not competitively prejudiced by the agency's error.

2. Protester's challenges to the agency's evaluation of its proposal under multiple
evaluation criteria are denied where the record demonstrates that the agency's
conclusions were reasonable, consistent with the terms of the synopsis, and adequately
documented.

3. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the protester's past performance is
denied where the record demonstrates that the agency's evaluation was reasonable
and consistent with the terms of the synopsis.

4. Protest challenging the agency's selection of the top ranked firms is denied where
the record demonstrates that the agency evaluated statements of qualification in a
manner  consistent with the terms of the synopsis and Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) subpart 36.6.
DECISION

Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., of Arlington, Virginia, protests the non-selection of its
proposal and the selection of Burns & McDonnell Engineering Co., Inc., of Arlington,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most