About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-422799,B-422799.2 Nov 07, 2024 1 (2024-11-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaorbt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                    U.S. GOVERNMENT   ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States


D  e c is  io n                               -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                 DOCUMENT  FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

Matter of:   Miltope Corporation        The decision   issued on the date below was subject to
                                               a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
File:        B-422799; B-422799.2        been approved  for public release.

Date:        November  7, 2024

Aron C. Beezley, Esq. and Gabrielle A. Sprio, Esq., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP,
for the protester.
Kevin P. Mullen, Esq., James A. Tucker, Esq., and Victoria Dalcourt Angle, Esq.,
Morrison & Foerster LLP, for DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC, the intervenor.
Lawrence  M. Brady, Esq., and Jonathan A. Hardage, Esq., Department of the Army, for
the agency.
Heather Self, Esq., and Peter H. Tran, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging agency's conduct of discussions is denied where the record
demonstrates the discussions were meaningful, equal, and not misleading;
typographical error in discussion letter did not competitively prejudice the protester.

2. Protest challenging evaluation of proposals is denied where the record shows the
evaluation largely was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation, and to the extent
evaluation errors occurred they did not result in competitive prejudice to the protester.

3. Protest challenging the best-value tradeoff is denied where the record reflects the
source selection authority was aware of the advantages and disadvantages of each
proposal when selecting a higher-rated, higher-priced proposal for award.
DECISION

Miltope Corporation, of Hope Hull, Alabama, protests the award of a contract to DRS
Network &  Imaging Systems, LLC (DRS), of Melbourne, Florida, under request for
proposals (RFP) No. W15QKN-23-R-0012, issued   by the Department of the Army, U.S.
Army  Materiel Command  (AMC)  for fire control systems for mortars and fielding activity.
The protester challenges the agency's conduct of discussions, evaluation of proposals,
and best-value tradeoff source selection decision.


We  deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most