About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-422805 Aug 30, 2024 1 (2024-08-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaoqtb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



G     A     O       U.S. GOVERNMENT   ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                             of the United States

                                             DOCUMENT  FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This version has been
                                         ---approved for public release.


Matter of:   Thales LAS France SAS

File:        B-422805

Date:     August 30,   2024

Jason N. Workmaster, Esq., Alexandra Prime, Esq., and Ashley Powers, Esq., Miller &
Chevalier Chartered, and Marc Reifsnyder de Chassey, Esq., Thales SA, for the
protester.
Amy  Laderberg O'Sullliivan, Esq., Emily Golchini, Esq., aand Zachary Schroeder, Esq.,
Crowell & Moring LLP, and Anjali Chaturverdi, Esq., BAE Systems, Inc., for BAE
Systems  Technology Solutions and Services Inc., the intervenor.
Erika Whelan Retta, Esq., and Christian H Robertson II, Esq., United States Air Force,
for the U.S. Space Force, the agency.
Michael Willems, Esq., and Evan D. Wesser, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest challenging the decision of a prime contractor to refuse to sign an end user
certificate with the protester in connection with a subcontract procurement is dismissed
where the procurement was not by the government and the agency awarding the prime
task order has not requested that subcontract protests be decided by our Office.
DECISION

Thales LAS  France SAS, of Limours, France, protests the conduct of a subcontract
procurement by BAE  Systems Technology  Solutions & Services, Inc. (BAE), of Falls
Church, Virginia, under solicitation No. MS-23-057, issued by BAE for radar arrays. The
protester contends that BAE, acting as the United States Space Force's representative,
has erred in refusing to sign an end user certificate to permit Thales to transmit its
complete subcontract proposal.

We  dismiss the protest for lack of jurisdiction.

The jurisdiction of our Office is established by the bid protest provisions of the
Competition in Contracting Act (CICA), 31 U.S.C. sections 3551-3557. Under CICA, our
Office has jurisdiction to resolve bid protests concerning solicitations and contract
awards that are issued by a Federal agency. 31 U.S.C. § 3551 (1)(A).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most