About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-422421.6,B-422421.7 Jul 17, 2024 1 (2024-07-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaoqqi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to Decision a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Matter of: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. File: B-422421.6; B-422421.7 Date: July 17, 2024 Noah B. Bleicher, Esq., Moshe B. Broder, Esq., Ginsey V. Kramarczyk, Esq., and Sierra A. Paskins. Esq., Jenner & Block, LLP, for the protester. James Y. Boland, Esq., Kelly Boppe, Esq, and Lindsay Reed, Esq., Venable LLP, for Salient CRGT, Inc., the intervenor. Michael J. Farr, Esq., Erika Whelan Retta, Esq., and Josephine Farinelli, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency. Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John Sorrenti, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest and supplemental protest challenging the agency's pending corrective action in response to a prior protest are dismissed as premature because they anticipate improper agency action while the corrective action remains ongoing. 2. Protest challenging the agency's stated intention to analyze a sample of the proposed labor rates for the price realism evaluation is denied where the protester has not shown that this approach is unreasonable or inconsistent with the solicitation. DECISION General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., of Falls Church, Virginia, protests the agency's pending corrective action following General Dynamics' prior protest of the award of a contract to Salient CRGT, Inc., of Fairfax, Virginia, under request for proposals (RFP) No. FA489023R001 3, issued by the Department of the Air Force for communications and technical support services. The protester argues that the agency's proposed corrective action to reevaluate proposals under the price/cost factor anticipates an evaluation that is unreasonable and inconsistent with the solicitation. In addition, General Dynamics contends that the agency should reevaluate proposals under the technical solution factor. We deny the protest in part and dismiss it in part.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most