About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-422203.2,B-422204.2 Feb 16, 2024 1 (2024-02-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaopxb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States Decision Matter of: Korea Engineering Consultants Corporation File: B-422203.2; B-422204.2 Date: February 16, 2024 Song Yong Eui, Esq., Central IP & Law, for the protester. Andrew J. Smith, Esq., Natalie W. McKiernan, Esq., Bruce A. Nessler, Esq., Nolan T. Koon, Esq., Dmitrius R. McGruder, Esq., and Nhu T. Tran, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency. Christine Milne, Esq., Todd C. Culliton, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protests that the agency unreasonably evaluated the protester's proposals are denied where the record shows that the agency reasonably determined that the proposals did not adequately address the requirements of the solicitations. DECISION Korea Engineering Consultants Corporation (KECC) protests its exclusion from the awards of two multiple-award indefinite-delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts issued under request for proposals (RFP) No. W91 QVN-23-R-0026 and RFP No. W91 QVN-23-R-0027 by the Department of the Army for general construction services to be provided at United States Forces Korea facilities in the Republic of Korea. The protester contends that the agency unreasonably evaluated its proposals as technically unacceptable.1 1 Our discussion here pertains to both solicitations referenced above. The solicitations are identical to each other, except that they are funded by different sources; RFP No. W91 QVN-23-R-0026 is funded with logistics cost sharing funds, and RFP No. W91 QVN-23-R-0027 is funded with operation and maintenance funds. Contracting Officer's Statement (COS) at 1. Because the solicitations are identical in content, and the protest allegations and the majority of the pleadings and supporting documents are essentially the same, including the technical evaluations for each proposal, we cite only to RFP No. W91 QVN-23-R-0026 and B-422203.2's pleadings and record for ease of reference and refer to only one proposal.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most