About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-421123 Dec 28, 2022 1 (2022-12-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaoobs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                       Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                 of the United States
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                           a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
been approved for public release.
Matter of: iSenpai, LLC
File:     B-421123
Date:     December 28, 2022
Shane J. McCall, Esq., Nicole D. Pottroff, Esq., John L. Holtz, Esq., Stephanie L. Ellis,
Esq., Gregory P. Weber, Esq., Koprince McCall Pottroff LLC, for the protester.
Colonel Frank Yoon, Major Ashley M. Ruhe, Major Alissa J. Schrider, and Laura L.
Atkinson, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
Samantha S. Lee, Esq., and Peter H. Tran, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Protest challenging non-selection for the establishment of a basic ordering agreement is
denied where the agency's evaluation was reasonable and adequately documented.
DECISION
iSenpai, LLC, a small business of Manassas, Virginia, protests its non-selection for the
establishment of a basic ordering agreement (BOA) under Department of the Air Force
request for quotations (RFQ) No. FA8307-22-R-0199 for software development,
security, and operations (DevSecOps) services. iSenpai argues that the agency
unreasonably evaluated its quotation and failed to document that evaluation.
We deny the protest.
BACKGROUND
The RFQ, issued on August 15, 2022, under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
part 16, sought to establish multiple BOAs with qualified vendors interested in providing
DevSecOps services for the Air Force. Agency Report (AR), Tab 3, RFQ Instructions
at 1. The RFQ provided for a three-step evaluation process. AR, Tab 13, Final RFQ
Instructions at 4-5. First, the Air Force would review quotations for compliance with the
terms of the RFQ (e.g., page limits and font sizes). Id. Second, the Air Force would
evaluate compliant quotations for technical capability, assigning a rating of highly
capable, capable, or not capable. Id. at 5-6. Only vendors with a rating of highly
capable would be invited to the third step, the oral presentation/portfolio review. Id.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most