About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-420713,B-420713.2 Aug 01, 2022 1 (2022-08-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaonme0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAiOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States

                                            DOCUMENT   FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                  a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          been approved for public release.


Matter of:  McLane  Advanced  Technologies, LLC

File:     B-420713; B-420713.2

Date:       August  1, 2022

Jayna M. Rust, Esq., Scott F. Lane, Esq., and Katherine S. Nucci, Esq., Thompson
Coburn  LLP, for the protester.
Robert K. Tompkins, Esq., Hillary J. Freund, Esq., Kelsey M. Hayes, Esq., and Sean R.
Belanger, Esq., Holland & Knight LLP, for STS Solutions and Training, LLC, the
intervenor.
Wade  L. Brown, Esq., and Pamela Kennerly Ignatius, Esq., Department of the Army, for
the agency.
Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John Sorrenti, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that misrepresentations in awardee's quotation should result in rejection of
the quotation is denied where alleged misrepresentations were not relied upon by the
agency in the evaluation, and therefore were not material to the selection decision.

2. Protest that source selection decision was improperly based on adjectival ratings,
rather than the merits of competing quotations, is denied where the record
demonstrates that in conducting the price/technical tradeoff the source selection official
reviewed the evaluation record and considered the merits of all quotations.
DECISION

McLane  Advanced  Technologies, LLC (MAT), of Vienna, Virginia, protests the issuance
of a task order to SS Solutions and Training, of San Antonio, Texas, pursuant to request
for quotations (RFQ) No. 1532024, issued by the Department of the Army, Army
Materiel Command,  for post-production software support for the agency's property book
unit supply enhanced (PBUSE) requirement. McLane  asserts that SST made material
misrepresentations in its quotation that render SST ineligible for award of the task order.
McLane  also protests that the agency performed an unreasonable best-value tradeoff
analysis.


We  deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most