About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-419839 Jun 25, 2021 1 (2021-06-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaomgw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 1O   o   U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
A Century of Non-Partisan Fact-Based Work
441 G St. N.W.                                        Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                  of the United States
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                           a GAO Protective Order. The entire decision has
been approved for public release.
Matter of: Mountainside Medical Equipment, Inc.
File:     B-419839
Date:     June 25, 2021
Dana B. Pashkoff, Esq., Jessica C. Abrahams, Esq., and Lauren N. Olmsted, Esq.,
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, for the protester.
Kathleen Ellis, Esq., and Steven Devine, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the
agency.
Mercedes Wilson-Barthes and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Protest challenging an agency's decision to make award to a company that the
protester alleges is not a verified a service-disabled veteran-owned small business is
dismissed where the protester is ineligible for award and therefore lacks the requisite
interest to maintain the protest.
DECISION
Mountainside Medical Equipment, Inc., of Marcy, New York, protests the award of a
contract to Magellan Solutions USA Inc., of Brisbane, California, under request for
quotations (RFQ) No. 36C242-20-Q-0920, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) for the provision of telephone switchboard operators at the agency's James J.
Peters Medical Center in Bronx, New York. The protester, a service-disabled veteran-
owned small business (SDVOSB), argues that the agency has improperly made the
award to a company that is not a verified SDVOSB, as required by the solicitation, and
that the agency could not meet the rule of two requirement for VA small-business set
asides.1
We dismiss the protest on the basis that the protester is not an interested party and the
protest does not establish a valid basis for challenging the agency's action.
1 The protester filed an agency-level protest on March 31, 2021, which the agency
dismissed for failure to provide a factual basis for protest and as untimely. Req. for
Dismissal, exh. 5, Agency Protest Dismissal, at 3-4.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most