HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaujw0001 and id is 1 raw text is:
A G A O Comptroller General
. Accountability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
approved for public release.
Decision
Matter of: Pemco Aeroplex, Inc.
File: B-310372
Date: December 27, 2007
David R. Hazelton, Esq., Roger S. Goldman, Esq., Kyle R. Jefcoat, Esq., Benjamin
Wei, Esq., Brent W. Johnson, Esq., and Jennifer S. Crone, Esq., Latham & Watkins
LLP, for the protester.
Rand L. Allen, Esq., Paul F. Khoury, Esq., Scott M. McCaleb, Esq., Kara M. Sacilotto,
Esq., and Nicole P. Wishart, Esq., Wiley Rein, LLP, for The Boeing Company, an
intervenor.
Brent G. Curtis, Esq., Kenneth C. Kitzmiller, Esq., and Gerald L. Trepkowski, Esq.,
Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. Protest challenging the agency's past performance evaluation is denied where
agency considered all reasonably available relevant past performance information
and, based on consideration of that information, made confidence assessments that
were not unreasonable.
2. Protest that agency was required to assign a Blue/Exceptional rating for any
mission capability subfactor in which protester's proposal contained an evaluated
strength is denied where solicitation stated that proposals containing one or more
evaluated strengths could properly receive either Blue/Exceptional or
Green/Acceptable ratings.
3. Where solicitation required that agency perform a price realism analysis and risk
assessment, and identified the particular data that would be considered, including
[deleted], protest is sustained given the absence of any agency documentation
reflecting the required analysis of the awardee's final proposal revisions, which
reflected [deleted] that appear to conflict with the agency's internal [deleted]
projections.](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.gao/gaocrptaujw0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)