About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-299344 1 (2007-04-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptauee0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: J. Womack Enterprises, Inc.

          File:        B-299344

          Date:        April 4, 2007

          Robert E. Bergman, Esq., for the protester.
          Maj. Kevin J. Wilkinson and Capt. David M. Creed, Department of the Air Force, for
          the agency.
          Edward Goldstein, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest that agency improperly considered adverse past performance information in
          evaluating the protester's proposal is denied where the agency's evaluation was
          based on a reasonable perception of the protester's inadequate prior performance.
          DECISION

          J. Womack Enterprises, Inc. protests the award of contracts to RCA Contracting, Inc.
          and MAPCO, Inc. by the Department of the Air Force under request for proposals
          (RFP) No. FA8501-05-R-0008 for mechanical/electrical type construction projects at
          Robins Air Force Base (AFB), Georgia. Womack argues that the Air Force
          improperly evaluated its past performance, that the agency acted with bad faith due
          to race and gender bias, that the Air Force's evaluation of its past performance was
          tantamount to a determination of nonresponsibility, and that the award decision was
          improper.

          We deny the protest.1




          1 The GAO attorney handling the case conducted an outcome prediction alternative
          dispute resolution (ADR) conference with the parties, advising them that the protest
          was likely to be denied for the reasons set forth in this decision. The protester
          informed our Office that it did not intend to withdraw its protest based on this ADR
          session, but would rather obtain a written decision on the merits of its case.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most