About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-298543 1 (2006-10-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptasqz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: A G A O Comptroller General . Accountability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Decision Matter of: STG, Inc. File: B-298543; B-298543.3 Date: October 30, 2006 Claude P. Goddard, Jr., Esq., Daniel J. Donohue, Esq., J. Michael Littlejohn, Esq., and Steven J. Koprince, Esq., Akerman Senterfitt Wickwire Gavin, for the protester. Paul E. Pompeo, Esq., Joseph P. Hornyak, Esq., and Stuart W. Turner, Esq., Holland & Knight LLP, for Beta Analytics, Incorporated, an intervenor. Mary E. Clarke, Esq., Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, for the agency. Edward Goldstein, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest alleging bait and switch where awardee requested permission from the agency to substitute nine personnel after award is denied where the record does not establish that the awardee knowingly or negligently misrepresented its intent to furnish the nine individuals for whom substitution was sought. 2. Protest challenging proposal evaluation and source selection is denied where record shows evaluation and award decision were reasonable and consistent with solicitation's evaluation terms and applicable procurement rules. DECISION STG, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Beta Analytics, Incorporated (BAI) under solicitation No. HROO11-06-R-0001, issued by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) for support services for the Security and Intelligence Directorate, under the Office of Management Operations at DARPA. STG challenges the agency's evaluation of its proposal and the agency's source selection decision, and alleges that BAI engaged in a bait and switch by substituting less qualified personnel after award as compared to the more highly qualified personnel identified in its proposal.' 1 STG expressly withdrew its allegation that DARPA failed to properly consider organizational conflicts of interest involving BAI. Protester's Comments at 2.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most