About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-298543.2 1 (2006-10-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptasqy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                  Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office    DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Maden Technologies

          File:        B-298543.2

          Date:        October 30, 2006

          T. Michael Guiffr6, Esq., Elizabeth M. Gill, Esq., Robert S. Brams, Esq., and James N.
          Schwarz, Esq., Patton Boggs LLP, for the protester.
          Paul E. Pompeo, Esq., Joseph P. Hornyak, Esq., and Stuart W. Turner, Esq., Holland
          & Knight LLP, for Beta Analytics, Incorporated, an intervenor.
          Mary E. Clarke, Esq., Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, for the agency.
          Edward Goldstein, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Agency reasonably concluded that potential for conflict of interest stemming from
          awardee's proposed use of a subcontractor who had served as an evaluator for the
          agency in connection with a previous procurement was mitigated where the
          subcontractor had signed a non-disclosure agreement in connection with her
          performance as an evaluator and the agency reasonably found that the subcontractor
          did not aid the awardee in preparing its proposal other than to submit a subcontract
          proposal.

          2. Protest alleging bait and switch where awardee requested permission from the
          agency to substitute nine personnel after award is denied where the record does not
          establish that the awardee knowingly or negligently misrepresented its intent to
          furnish the nine individuals for whom substitution was sought.
          DECISION

          Maden Technologies protests the award of a contract to Beta Analytics, Incorporated
          (BAI) under solicitation No. HR0011-06-R-0001, issued by the Defense Advanced
          Research Projects Agency (DARPA) for support services for the Security and
          Intelligence Directorate, under the Office of Management Operations at DARPA.
          Maden argues that the agency failed to address an organizational conflict of interest
          affecting BAI; BAI engaged in a bait and switch by substituting less qualified
          personnel after award as compared to the more highly qualified personnel identified
          in its proposal; the agency improperly evaluated Maden's proposal; the discussions

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most