About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-296516.2 1 (2006-03-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaslj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Optical Systems Technology, Inc.

          File:        B-296516.2; B-296516.3

          Date:        March 17, 2006

          Michael R. Charness, Esq., and Amy R. Napier, Esq., Vinson & Elkins, for the
          protester.
          James A. McMillan, Esq., Grayson & Kubli, for Knight's Armament Company, an
          intervenor.
          Maj. Peter H. Tran, and Raymond M. Saunders, Esq., for the agency.
          David A. Ashen, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest that rejection of proposal was based on unreasonable testing of protester's
          sample night sights for .50 caliber rifles is denied where, contrary to protester's
          assertion, record indicates that agency undertook reasonable efforts to ensure that
          sights were securely mounted and properly adjusted during testing; even if these
          efforts were not entirely successful (and there is no basis in the record for reaching
          such a conclusion), the agency could reasonably conclude that the susceptibility of
          protester's sights to significant damage and degraded performance, notwithstanding
          reasonable efforts to mount the sights correctly, rendered the sights technically
          unacceptable.
          DECISION

          Optical Systems Technology, Inc. (OSTI) protests the award of a contract to Knight's
          Armament Company (KAC) under request for proposals (RFP) No. H92222-05-R-
          0007, issued by the United States Special Operations Command for
          non-developmental Visual Augmentation System (VAS) In-Line Clip-on Night Sights.
          OSTI asserts that the agency's rejection of its proposal was based on unreasonable
          testing of its sample items. OSTI also challenges the evaluation of KAC's proposal.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP contemplated award of an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity, fixed-unit-
          price contract for up to 3,000 VAS night sights over a 5-year period. The RFP's
          performance specification provided that the night sight shall be an in-line, clip-on

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most