About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-294594 1 (2004-11-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptapoy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




           G    A     0                                                 Comptroller General
              SIntegrity Reliability                                    of the United States
  ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548




           Decision


           Matter of: Marriott Downtown

           File:        B-294594

           Date:        November 8, 2004

           Phillip E. Johnson, Federal Contract Specialists, Inc., for the protester.
           Capt. Eugene Y. Kim, Department of the Army, for the agency.
           Kenneth Kilgour and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
           participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           Protest of proposal evaluation and source selection is denied where record shows
           evaluation and award decision were reasonable and consistent with solicitation's
           evaluation terms and applicable procurement rules.
           DECISION

           Marriott Downtown protests the award of a contract to CMS-Radisson Hotel
           Memphis Airport by the Department of the Army under request for proposals (RFP)
           No. W912D-04-R-0007, issued to procure meals, lodging, and transportation for
           armed forces applicants at the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) in
           Memphis, Tennessee. Marriott argues that the selection of CMS-Radisson's proposal
           was unreasonable.

           We deny the protest.

           The RFP, a commercial acquisition using a combination of Federal Acquisition
           Regulation (FAR) parts 12, 13, 14 and 15, provided for award of a fixed-price
           requirements contract, for a base year period with four 1-year options, to the offeror
           whose proposal was most advantageous to the government. The RFP required that
           offerors submit a technical/quality proposal as well as a separate cost/price proposal.
           The RFP advised that offers would be evaluated on four factors: facility
           quality/quality control, past performance, transportation, and cost/price. The first
           factor, facility quality/quality control, included sanitation and cleanliness, room
           condition, meals, security, special features, facility location, and quality control. The
           RFP also advised that the non-cost factors were more important than cost or price,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most