About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-294061 1 (2004-08-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptapnk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A    0                                                 Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                   of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States Government Accountability Office    DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                     approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Frontier Technology, Inc.

          File:       B-294061

          Date:       August 12, 2004

          Johnathan M. Bailey, Esq., Bailey & Bailey, for the protester.
          Capt. Charles K. Bucknor, Jr., and Maj. Gregory R. Bockin, Department of the Army,
          for the agency.
          Linda S. Lebowitz, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest of agency appeal authority's cost comparison decision made pursuant to
          Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 is denied where the appeal authority
          reasonably determined that the cost of in-house performance would be lower than
          the evaluated cost of contractor performance.
          DECISION

          Frontier Technology, Inc. protests the decision of the Department of the Army's
          appeal authority, pursuant to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular
          A-76, that it would be more economical to perform in-house the requirements of the
          Directorate of Information Management at the United States Military Academy
          (USMA) at West Point, New York, rather than to contract for these services under
          request for proposals (RFP) No. DABJ45-03-R-0003. Frontier challenges the appeal
          authority's cost comparison decision, essentially arguing that if various errors in the
          government's in-house cost estimate were corrected, the evaluated cost of
          performance under a contract with Frontier would be lower than the cost of
          in-house performance.

          We deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          On December 20, 2002, the Army issued the RFP as a competitive small business
          set-aside for the provision of information management support services at the
          USMA. The RFP contemplated the award of a fixed-price contract for a base period
          and four 1-year option periods. Offerors were advised that the procurement would

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most