About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-294014 1 (2004-06-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptapmz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O0                                                 Comptroller General
             A a * Integrity Reliability                              of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Orion Construction Company, Inc.

          File:       B-294014

          Date:       June 30, 2004

          Thomas J. Kelleher, Jr., Esq., Smith, Currie & Hancock, for the protester.
          Maj. Gregory R. Bockin and Charles D. Shults, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
          agency.
          Linda C. Glass, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Where an invitation for bids (IFB) soliciting bids for multiple line items contains
          clauses that permit the government to accept any item or combination of items in the
          bid, the agency has the discretion to make a partial award of any combination unless
          the IFB elsewhere contains express language precluding such an award.
          DECISION

          Orion Construction Company, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Dorado
          Services, Inc. under invitation for bids (IFB) No. W9124C-04-B-0002, issued by the
          Department of the Army for demolition, framing, and roofing work for a building
          located at Fort Jackson, South Carolina. Orion essentially argues that the agency's
          partial award of two contract line items (CLINs) to Dorado was inconsistent with the
          IFB.

          We deny protest.

          The IFB was issued on February 16, 2004. The IFB identified five CLINs. The agency
          reports that because of the size of the roof to be replaced, the engineers were not
          certain that the projected funding would permit all the re-roofing to be performed.
          Therefore, the engineers divided the work into phases, which would give the agency
          the flexibility to award all or part of the work depending on the prices received.
          The CLINs as contained in the bid schedule reflect this approach, that is, each CLIN
          reflected a part of the roof requiring re-roofing. Agency Report, Tab 17, Contract
          Specialist's Statement, at 1. Several provisions of the solicitation advised bidders
          that the government reserved the right to award all, none, or a combination of the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most