About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-290961 1 (2002-10-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaohq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                 Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office                DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Mnemonics, Inc.

          File:        B-290961

          Date:        October 28, 2002

          John R. Kancilia, Esq., Gray, Harris & Robinson, for the protester.
          Maj. Robert B. Neill and Wayne J. Van Kauwenbergh, Esq., Department of the Army,
          for the agency.
          Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Where solicitation provided that technical evaluation factors would be evaluated
          against specified requirements on a pass/fail basis, and agency concluded that
          protester's proposal met all the stated pass/fail requirements, agency improperly
          excluded protester's proposal from the competitive range [deleted] because
          protester's proposal was not among the most highly rated, where the agency's
          determination was based on an assessment of proposals' strengths weaknesses
          and deficiencies under the factors that the solicitation indicated would be
          evaluated on a pass/fail basis, as well as under other undisclosed evaluation
          factors.
          DECISION

          Mnemonics, Inc. protests the Department of the Army's exclusion of Mnemonics'
          proposal from the competitive range under request for proposals (RFP) No. USZA95-
          02-R-0017 for the development and production of Intel Broadcast Receivers (IBR) to
          be used in MH-47 and MH-60 helicopters. Mnemonics' protests, among other things,
          that the agency's exclusion of Mnemonics' proposal, and the retention of [deleted]
          proposal in the competitive range, were based on the agency's application of
          unstated evaluation factors.


We sustain the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most