About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-290593 1 (2002-08-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaogd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: John Blood

          File:        B-290593

          Date:       August 26, 2002

          John Blood for the protester.
          Lynn W. Flanagan, Esq., Department of Agriculture, for the agency.
          Paula A. Williams, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest that contracting agency improperly evaluated protester's past performance in
          a procurement using simplified acquisition procedures is denied where at the time of
          its selection decision agency had no reason to question the validity of the
          information furnished by the protester's references. Agency was not required to
          conduct discussions or otherwise communicate with protester regarding the adverse
          past performance information obtained from the protester's references.
          DECISION

          John Blood protests the issuance of a purchase order to URI Forestry Services, Inc.
          under request for quotations (RFQ) No. RFQ-RMAST-02-033, issued by the Forest
          Service, United States Department of Agriculture, for tree thinning and snagging
          services at the Nebraska National Forest. Blood challenges the evaluation of the
          firm's past performance record and award to a higher-priced vendor.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFQ, issued as a small business set-aside under simplified acquisition
          procedures, contemplated the issuance of a fixed-price order to the commercial
          vendor whose quotation represented the best value to the government. Quotations
          were to be evaluated on the basis of price and past performance; past performance
          was stated to be as important as price. To evaluate past performance, vendors were
          required to provide specific information about recent relevant similar contracts from
          the last 3 years that support past and present performance, as well as contact
          information for three references. This information would be reviewed by the agency

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most