About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-287573 1 (2001-07-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptamqf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A     0                                                 Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                     of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: KIRA Inc.

          File:        B-287573; B-287573.2; B-287573.3

          Date:        July 23, 2001

          J. Patrick McMahon, Esq., William T. Welch, Esq., Barton, Baker, McMahon & Tolle,
          for the protester.
          David J. Taylor, Esq., Tighe Patton Armstrong Teasdale, for Environmental
          Management, Inc., an intervenor.
          Sharon A. Jenks, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
          Scott H. Riback, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest that agency improperly failed to downgrade awardee's technical proposal
          because of the possibility that one of its subcontractors might file for bankruptcy is
          denied where solicitation does not provide for the evaluation of proposals based on
          financial stability.

          2. Protest that agency did not engage in meaningful discussions with protester is
          denied where record shows that all significant deficiencies were brought to
          protester's attention and firm was afforded an opportunity to address those
          concerns.
          DECISION

          KIRA, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Environmental Management, Inc.
          (EMI) under request for proposals (RFP) No. F24604-01-R-0001, issued by the
          Department of the Air Force for consolidated facilities maintenance services at
          Malmstrom Air Force Base. KIRA argues that the agency misevaluated EMI's and its
          proposal, and failed to conduct adequate discussions with the firm.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP sought proposals to perform numerous requirements, including facilities
          and grounds maintenance, custodial services, refuse and recycling removal services
          and simplified acquisition for base engineering requirements (SABER). Offerors
          were advised that the agency would make award to the firm submitting the proposal

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most