About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-287477 1 (2001-06-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptampv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                     of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                   The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                       approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: W R Systems, Ltd.

          File:        B-287477; B-287477.3

          Date:        June 29, 2001

          John A. Howell, Esq., and Anne K. Shukis, Esq., Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, for the
          protester.
          J. Michael Sawyers, Esq., Drug Enforcement Administration, for the agency.
          Aldo A. Benejam, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Contention that contracting officer's (CO) decision to reject initial evaluations
          and convene a new technical evaluation panel was designed to ensure that the
          protester was improperly eliminated from consideration is denied, where there is no
          evidence in the record that the CO's decisions were not made in good faith or that
          they were designed with the intent of changing technical rankings or avoiding an
          award to the protester.

          2. Allegation that protester was prejudiced because in preparing its proposal it
          assumed that offerors were prohibited from proposing certain individuals as core
          personnel on the basis of their work history is denied where the solicitation did not
          impose any restrictions, limits, or prohibitions on the individuals that could be
          proposed to fill the required core positions due to their prior work.

          3. Protest challenging agency's evaluation of awardee's past performance is denied
          where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the
          evaluation criteria set forth in the solicitation.
          DECISION

          W R Systems, Ltd. (WRS) protests the award of a contract to Comprehensive
          Technologies, Inc. (CTI) under request for proposals (RFP) No. DEA-00-R-0013,
          issued by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for monitoring, translation,
          transcription, linguistic data analysis, and technical support services. WRS
          challenges the award on several grounds, including that DEA: (1) unreasonably
          decided to reject the initial evaluations and convene an entirely new evaluation
          panel; (2) failed to downgrade CTI's proposal for proposing personnel it could not

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most