About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-286875 1 (2001-02-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptamnq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O0                                                 Comptroller General
             A a * Integrity Reliability                              of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Power Connector, Inc.

          File:       B-286875; B-286875.2

          Date:       February 14, 2001

          Pamela J. Mazza, Esq., and Andrew P. Hallowell, Esq., Piliero, Mazza & Pargament,
          for the protester.
          Geoffrey A. Barrow, Esq., Jenner & Block, for Day Leather Corporation, an
          intervenor.
          Michael A. Lewis, Esq., Federal Prison Industries, for the agency.
          Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          In evaluating past performance under solicitation for quantity of leather, agency
          reasonably disregarded non-leather supply contracts in its evaluation of the
          protester, and limited its evaluation to leather contracts, on the basis that leather
          contracts were the most relevant.
          DECISION

          Power Connector, Inc. (PCI) protests the award of a contract to Day Leather
          Corporation under request for quotations (RFQ) No. 6200000119, issued by the
          Federal Bureau of Prisons, UNICOR, for leather to be used in manufacturing work
          gloves. PCI argues that UNICOR should have rejected Day's quotation as materially
          unbalanced, and that it misevaluated PCI's past performance.

          We deny the protest.

          The solicitation provided for a best value award of a fixed-price, indefinite-quantity
          contract for a base year, with four 1-year option periods. The quotations were to be
          evaluated against three factors, listed in descending order of importance--past
          performance, compliance with technical specifications and price; the past
          performance and technical factors combined were significantly more important than
          price. RFQ at 39. In order to establish compliance with the technical specifications,
          vendors were required to submit samples and lab test results for evaluation on a
          pass/fail basis. Regarding past performance, vendors were required to complete a

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most