About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-285351.3 1 (2001-05-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptamli0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A     0                                                 Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                     of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office                DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Olympus Building Services, Inc.

          File:        B-285351.3

          Date:        May 31, 2001

          Ruth E. Ganister, Esq., Rosenthal & Ganister, for the protester.
          Mark E. Warnick, Esq., General Services Administration, for the agency.
          Jacqueline Maeder, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest challenging several aspects of evaluation of protester's proposal is denied
          where agency reasonably downgraded protester's proposed personnel training
          program; protest regarding remaining evaluation areas is academic, since awardee
          would remain in line for award even if protester's proposal were awarded the
          maximum points possible under each of those areas.
          DECISION

          Olympus Building Services, Inc. protests the evaluation of its revised proposal, and
          the award of a contract to Mitch Murch's Maintenance Management Company
          (MMMM) under request for proposals (RFP) No. GS06P-99-GXC-0021, issued by the
          General Services Administration (GSA) for janitorial and related services at the
          Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse, St. Louis, Missouri. Olympus principally maintains
          that the agency did not properly evaluate its proposal.

          We deny the protest.

          The solicitation, initially issued on September 16, 1999, contemplated the award
          of a fixed-price contract for a base year, with four 1-year options. Based on the
          evaluation, Olympus's proposal was eliminated from the competitive range.
          Olympus challenged the evaluation of its proposal in a protest to our Office. In our
          decision Olympus Bldg. Servs., Inc., B-285351, B-285351.2, Aug. 17, 2000, 2000 CPD
            178, we sustained the protest, finding that GSA improperly had applied undisclosed
          standards in evaluating proposals. We recommended that the agency amend the
          solicitation to provide a rational and reasonably disclosed evaluation scheme,
          request and evaluate revised proposals and make a new source selection decision.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most