About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-283286.2 1 (1999-11-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajlx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 E                                                             Comptroller General
                                                               of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Kemper Construction Company, hie.

         File:      B-283286.2

         Date:      November 29, 1999


         Stephen R. Remsberg, Esq., Lemle & Kelleher, for the protester.
         Edward Goldstein, Esq., Army Corps of Engineers, for the agency.
         Jennifer D. Westfall-Mc Grail, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
         General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Where bidder submitted a bid bond accompanied by a faxed copy of a power of
         attorney, and the bid documents did not establish that the surety would be bound by
         such a power of attorney, the bond was unacceptable and the bid nonresponsive.
         DECISION

         Kemper Construction Company, Inc. protests the rejection of its bid under invitation
         for bids (IFB) No. DACW29-99-B-0069, issued by the Army Corps of Engineers for
         construction of a shop and garage building at the Mississippi River Spillway,
         St. Charles Parish, Louisiana. The agency rejected Kemper's bid as nonresponsive
         because the power of attorney attached to its bid bond was a faxed copy. The
         protester contends that the copy was sufficient to bind the surety and thus should
         have been accepted.

         We deny the protest.

         The IFB, which was issued on June 15, 1999, required bidders to submit with their
         bids a bid bond in the amount of 20 percent of the bid price. Five bids were received
         by the bid opening time on July 15. Kemper was the apparent low bidder; Julius A.
         Payne Company, Inc. and Cooper Construction were second and third low,
         respectively; and DeLoach Corp. was fourth low. On July 16, DeLoach filed an
         agency-level protest, contending that the bids of Kemper, Payne, and Cooper should
         all be rejected as nonresponsive and that award should be made to DeLoach. The
         contracting officer agreed with DeLoach that Cooper's bid was nonresponsive, but
         denied the protest with regard to Kemper's and Payne's bids.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most