About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-280511.2 1 (1998-10-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahvv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to a I
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.



             Matter of: GTS Duratek, Inc.

             File:       B-280511.2; B-280511.3

             Date:        October 19, 1998

             Mary Ita Snyder, Esq., Kevin P. Mullen, Esq., Richard J. Vacura, Esq., and Carl L.
             Vacketta, Esq., Piper & Marbury, for the protester.
             Raymond Fioravanti, Esq., and Kenneth B. Weckstein, Esq., Epstein Becker &
             Green, for Allied Technology Group, Inc., an intervenor.
             Elizabeth Rivera, Esq., and Sandra D. Jumper, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the
             agency.
             Tania Calhoun, Esq. and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Protest that contracting agency improperly determined that awardee's proposal
             met the solicitation's minimum technical requirements is sustained where the
             proposal is ambiguous, at best, with respect to whether it met certain requirements
             and where the contemporaneous evaluation documentation shows serious concerns
             regarding the awardee's technical acceptability that were not resolved.

             2. Protest that contracting agency improperly evaluated offerors' past performance
             is sustained where the record shows that, with respect to both offerors, the agency
             ignored relevant information that was personally known to one of the agency
             evaluators, and where the agency failed to comply with the solicitation's evaluation
             criteria with respect to the past performance evaluation.
             DECISION

             GTS Duratek, Inc. (GTSD)1 protests the award of a contract to Allied Technology
             Group, Inc. (ATG) under request for proposals (RFP) No. N00604-97-R-1001, issued
             by the Department of the Navy for the comprehensive reduction and disposal of
             radioactive waste generated by the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard (PHNS) in Pearl
             Harbor, Hawaii. GTSD challenges as improper the Navy's conclusion that ATG's
             proposal met the solicitation's minimum technical requirements; the Navy's


             1The entity initially involved in the procurement, Scientific Ecology Group, Inc., was
             purchased by GTSD prior to the submission of second best and final offers (BAFO).
             GTSD's Seventh Revised Proposal at 1.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most