About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-280003 1 (1998-08-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahuf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Madico, Inc.

             File:       B-280003

             Date:       August 12, 1998

             Jay Larkin for the protester.
             John S. Albanese, Esq., Department of Defense, for the agency.
             Linda C. Glass, Esq., and Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Protest that agency improperly selected higher-priced proposal is denied where the
             solicitation made technical considerations more important than price and the
             agency reasonably concluded that the technical superiority of the awardee's
             proposal warranted payment of the associated price premium.
             DECISION

             Madico, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Mid-Atlantic Service & Supply
             Corporation under request for proposals (RFP) No. MDA946-98-R-3001, issued by
             the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services for the purchase and
             installation of security glass coverings at the Pentagon. Madico objects to the
             agency's decision to award to Mid-Atlantic at a price higher than that offered by
             Madico.

             We deny the protest.

             The solicitation, issued December 5, 1997, contemplated the award of a fixed-price
             contract for the purchase and installation of fragment retention film on windows at
             the Pentagon building and windows at the Child Care Center at the north side of the
             Pentagon. The RFP provided that proposals would be evaluated on the basis of (in
             descending order of importance) technical capability of the item offered to meet the
             government requirement, price, and past performance, and that award would be
             made to the offeror whose proposal conforming to the solicitation would be most
             advantageous to the government. RFP, Addendum No. 4, § 52.212-2, Evaluation --
             Commercial Items. One of the RFP requirements for the fragment retention film
             was that it shall exhibit a flame spread index not exceeding 25 and a smoke

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most