About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278408 1 (1998-01-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahom0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Thermolten Tech., Inc.

             File:        B-278408; B-278408.2

             Date:        January 26, 1998

             E. Kent Hirsch, Esq., for the protester.
             Frank J. Borgia for Burns and Roe Enterprises, Inc., an intervenor.
             Joshua A. Kranzberg, Esq., and Lisa R. Simon, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
             agency.
             Douglas McArthur, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Protest against conduct of debriefing, contending that agency should have had
             experts capable of understanding technical aspects of proposal conduct the
             debriefing in order to allow protester to elaborate on its inadequately written
             proposal, is denied; the adequacy of a debriefing is a procedural matter concerning
             agency actions after award which are unrelated to the validity of the award, and, in
             any event, the purpose of a debriefing is not to give offerors the opportunity to cure
             deficiencies in their proposals, but to furnish the basis for the selection decision
             and contract award.

             2. Protest that agency improperly rejected protester's proposal for failure to meet
             solicitation's technical requirements is denied where the record shows that proposal
             contained major deficiencies--a failure to present a coherent explanation of the
             offered process for disposing of chemical munitions and a general lack of care in
             assessing and managing the potentially lethal byproducts of the process--reasonably
             warranting its rejection.

             3. Post-award protest that agency improperly limited competition to offerors of
             mature technologies is dismissed as untimely where solicitation made clear that
             agency was seeking only such technologies and protest thus should have been filed
             before the time set for receipt of initial proposals.
             DECISION

             Thermolten Tech., Inc. protests the rejection of its proposal submitted in response
             to request for proposals (RFP) No. DAAMO1-97-R-0031, for identification of
             technologies other than incineration for demilitarization of assembled chemical
             weapons. Thermolten generally challenges the evaluation of its proposal and
             contends that, given the unique nature of its process, which could not be explained

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most