About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278415 1 (1997-12-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagff0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: SWR, Inc.

             Date:       B-278415

             Date:       December 17, 1997

             Timothy S. Swindall for the protester.
             B.J. Braun, Esq., Department of Transportation, U.S. Coast Guard, for the agency.
             Katherine I. Riback, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency properly rejected unsigned proposal containing only a typed signature
             where no other documentation submitted with the proposal had an original
             signature and the offeror had not, on or prior to the closing date for receipt of
             pro po sals, submitted a corporate resolution authorizing typewritten signatures.
             DECISION

             SWR, Inc. protests the rejection of its proposal under request for proposals (RFP)
             No. DTCG23-98-R-TPMO1B, issued by the Department of Transportation, U.S. Coast
             Guard for maintenance, repair and rebuilding of mail processing equipment. The
             agency rejected SWR's proposal because it was not signed. SWR contends that this
             omission should have been waived as a minor informality.

             We deny the protest.

             The agency received two proposals, including SWR's, by the closing date. Although
             SWR proposed the apparent low price, its proposal was unsigned and contained
             only the typewritten name of SWR's Vice President, below which was typewritten,
             Vice President, SWR, Inc. No documents submitted by SWR with its proposal
             contained an original signature. After initially considering the possibility of waiving
             the lack of signature as a minor informality, the agency eventually determined to
             reject SWR's proposal as unacceptable and made award to Pitney Bowes, the other
             offeror.

             SWR maintains that its pro po sal contains a typewritten signature and contends that
             its firm formally adopted, before the closing date, a resolution permitting the
             execution of documents by typewritten signature. SWR also points out that its
             proposed price was significantly below the awardee's.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most