About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278352 1 (1997-12-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagfd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: For Your Information, Inc.

             File:       B-278352

             Date:       December 15, 1997

             Edward V. Gregorowicz, Jr., Esq., and Frederick P. fink, Esq., for the protester.
             James K Kearney, Esq., Scott D. Chaplin, Esq., and Theodore W. Atkinson, Esq.,
             Reed Smith Shaw & McClay, for RGII Technologies, Inc., an intervenor.
             Kimberly A. Kegowicz, Esq., U.S. Coast Guard, for the agency.
             Henry J. Gorczycki, Esq., and Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             In a negotiated procurement for services, a proposal that offers personnel that do
             not satisfy the solicitation's personnel qualification requirements is unacceptable
             and may not properly form the basis for award.
             DECISION

             For Your Information, Inc. (FYI) protests the award of a contract to RGII
             Technologies, Inc. under request for proposals (RFP) No. DTCG23-97-R-HRMOO1,
             issued by the U.S. Coast Guard for information technology support services. FYI
             contends that RGII's proposal did not satisfy the RFP's personnel qualification
             requirements and was unacceptable.

             We sustain the protest.

             The RFP provided for the award of an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract
             with fixed-price, hourly labor rates on a best value basis. Offerors were informed
             that the procurement would be conducted as a two-phased competition, restricted
             to small business concerns certified under the Small Business Administration's
             section 8(a) program. Phase I was stated to be less important than phase II. Under
             phase I, the agency would evaluate mini-proposals and past performance, and
             advise offerors of their chances of receiving award. Under phase II, proposals
             would be evaluated under the following factors, listed in descending order of
             importance: oral presentation/slides,1 personnel data forms (PDF), and cost/price.
             The phase II technical evaluation factors together were stated to be significantly
             more important than cost/price.


             'A number of evaluation subcriteria were identified under the oral presentation
             factor.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most