About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278112 1 (1997-12-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaget0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Imaging Systems Technology

             File:       B-278112

             Date:       December 10, 1997

             Carol Ann Wedding for the protester.
             J. Randolph MacPherson, Esq., Sullivan & Worcester LLP, for The GM Cope-LAU
             Joint Venture, an intervenor.
             Linda Oliver, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
             Jeanne W. Isrin, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Protest that proposal was improperly downgraded based on results of equipment
             demonstration is denied where solicitation stated that demonstration was part of
             initial proposal and required offerors to show compliance with statement of work
             requirements at the demonstration, and protester failed to demonstrate that its
             equipment met two of the requirements at the demonstration.
             DECISION

             Imaging Systems Technology (IST) protests the award of a contract to The GM
             Cope-LAU Joint Venture under request for proposals (RFP) No. N00019-97-R-0043,
             issued by the Department of the Navy for 38 Video Mapper Replacement Units,
             250 Remote Control Units, system software, 4 Installation Checkout Kits, training,
             and associated data.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP contemplated award of a fixed-price contract under Federal Acquisition
             Regulation (FAR) part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items, and contained a
             statement of work (SOW) which outlined the government's requirements. Award
             was to be made on a best value basis, considering price and the following technical
             factors: (1) technical aspects of the item offered to meet the government's
             requirements, including warranty (most important factor); (2) ability to meet the
             delivery schedule; and (3) past performance. In addition to a written description of
             the manufacturer's product specifications, ability to meet the delivery schedule and
             the data items proposed and how they meet the government's requirements,
             offerors were required to conduct a technical demonstration of their system, during
             which compliance with all requirements had to be demonstrated.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most