About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277883 1 (1997-10-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagdy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Millbrook Industrial Contracts, Ltd.

             File:       B-277883

             Date:        October 29, 1997

             S. G. Hogan for the protester.
             Maj. Michael J. O'Farrell, Jr., Department of the Army, for the agency.
             Mary Curcio, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
             participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Protest that solicitation improperly restricts competition by requiring contractor to
             paint vehicles at contractor's facility, rather than on government installation, is
             denied where agency reasonably determined that restriction is necessary to
             minimize government's potential liability for environmental violations which could
             result from hazardous paint dust and fumes.
             DECISION

             Millbrook Industrial Contracts, Ltd. protests the terms of invitation for bids No.
             DAJA22-97-B-0038, issued by the Department of the Army, Wiesbaden, Germany, for
             the sanding, sandblasting, rustproofing, and Chemical Agent Resistant Coat
             painting of tracked and wheeled military vehicles located at 26 U.S. military
             installations in Germany. The solicitation called for tracked vehicles to be sanded
             and painted at 11 installations, and for wheeled vehicles to be sanded and painted
             at the contractor's own facility. Millbrook argues that the requirement that the
             wheeled vehicles be sanded and painted at the contractor's own facility is
             unnecessary and unduly restricts competition; Millbrook wants to work on the
             wheeled vehicles at government installations in the firm's mobile booths.

             We deny the protest.

             The determination of an agency's minimum needs, and the best method of
             accommodating them, is primarily within the agency's discretion. ViON Corp.,
             B-256363, June 15, 1994, 94-1 CPD 373 at 8. We will not question an agency's
             assessment of its minimum needs absent a clear showing that the assessment is
             unreasonable. Tri-County Fence Co., Inc., B-209262.2, Apr. 12, 1983, 83-1 CPD
             T 381 at 3.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most