About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277656 1 (1997-11-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagcz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to a I
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.



             Matter of: Greenwich Air Services, Inc.

             File:       B-277656

             Date:        November 5, 1997

             John A. Ordway, Esq., Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, for the protester.
             Paul Shnitzer, Esq., Crowell & Moring, for Turbo Power & Marine Systems, Inc.
             an intervenor.
             Richard Gonzales, Esq., Department of Transportation, for the agency.
             Katherine Riback, Esq., Glenn Wolcott, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the
             General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. RFP requirement that technical representative of original equipment
             manufacturer (OEM) be present during six critical phases of the overhaul and repair
             work of power turbines is not unduly restrictive where requirement is based on
             agency's reasonable concerns regarding safe operation of ships.

             2. Protester's unsupported speculation that involvement of OEM technical
             representative will undermine contract performance, thereby decreasing the
             protester's chances for subsequent awards, does not provide basis for protest.
             DECISION

             Greenwich Air Services, Inc. protests the terms of request for proposals (RFP)
             No. DTCG40-97-R-70026, issued by the Coast Guard for the overhaul and repair of
             Pratt & Whitney power turbines.1 Greenwich contends that the solicitation
             requirement that a technical representative of the original equipment manufacturer
             (OEM) be present during certain phases of the overhaul and repair process
             improperly restricts competition and creates an organizational conflict of interest
             for Turbo Power and Marine Systems, Inc., the OEM.2






             1The power turbines are used in the Coast Guard's 378' High Endurance Cutters and
             400' Ice Breakers.


2Turbo Power and Marine Systems, Inc. is an affiliate of Pratt & Whitney.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most