About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-276912 1 (1997-08-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagaf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: CardioMetrix

             File:       B-276912; B-276912.2

             Date:       August 11, 1997

             Robert J. Loring, Ph.D. for the protester.
             Jan Rich, for CorVel Corp., an intervenor.
             Ann L. Chaney, Esq., and Henry Valiulis, Railroad Retirement Board, for the agency.
             Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Contracting agency's determination not to set aside procurement for small
             business concerns was proper where, based on the procurement history for the
             solicited services, agency concluded that it could not reasonably expect to receive
             bids from at least two responsible small business concerns offering a fair market
             pric e.

             2. Solicitation requirement that contractor provide additional medical examiners in
             cases where a claimant must travel more than 50 miles to an appointment is not
             improper where requirement reflects the agency's legitimate needs, even though
             costing the requirement for proposal purposes may be difficult for offerors,
             resulting in significant contractor risk.
             DECISION

             CardioMetrix protests certain terms of solicitation No. 97-B-2, issued by the Railroad
             Retirement Board (RRB) for disability examination services on a fixed-price,
             indefinite-quantity basis. CardioMetrix principally asserts that the solicitation
             should have been set aside for exclusive small business participation.

             We deny the protest.

             SET-ASIDE DECISION

             An acquisition of services over $100,000, such as the one at issue here, is required
             to be set aside for small business concerns where the contracting officer determines
             that there is a reasonable expectation that offers will be obtained from at least two
             responsible small business concerns and that award will be made at fair market
             prices. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) § 19.502-2(b). Here, the contracting
             officer's decision not to set the solicitation aside was based on the procurement

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most