About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-275962.2 1 (1997-05-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptafwq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: United Terex, Inc.

             File:       B-275962.2

             Date:       May 30, 1997

             Robert G. Fryling, Esq., and Edward J. Hoffman, Esq., Blank Rome Comisky &
             McCauley, for the protester.
             Karl Dix, Jr., Esq., Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, for Advanced Aerospace Materials
             Corporation, an intervenor.
             Marc Shepler, Esq., Defense Logistics Agency, for the agency.
             Robert C. Arsenoff, Esq., Glenn Wolcott, Esq., and Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., Office of
             the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Protest challenging the evaluation of proposals is denied where evaluation was
             reasonable and in accordance with the evaluation factors set forth in the
             solicitation.
             DECISION

             United Terex, Inc. (UTI) protests the award of a contract to Advanced Aerospace
             Materials Corporation (AAMC) under request for proposals (RFP) No. SP0740-96-R-
             1702, issued by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) for aircraft towbars fabricated
             from tubing. UTI alleges that the proposals were misevaluated.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP was issued on July 29, 1996, for 375 towbars identified as National Stock
             Number (NSN) 1730-01-101-9061 in Federal Supply Class (FSC) 1730. It was
             amended once. As amended, the RFP notified offerors that DLA was seeking
             delivery within 350 days but would evaluate offers of different delivery schedules in
             accordance with an FSC-specific Delivery Evaluation Factor (DEF). Offerors were
             advised that the offered price would be adjusted by a formula using the DEF so that
             shorter-than-required delivery schedules would result in an evaluated price which
             was lower than the offered price while longer-than-required schedules would result
             in an evaluated price higher than the offered price. Proposed phased deliveries were
             to be evaluated using a weighted average.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most