About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-275505 1 (1997-02-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptafus0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Spectrum Controls Systems, Inc.

             File:       B-275505

             Date:       February 27, 1997

             L.E. Mueller for the protester.
             Robert W. Pessolano, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
             Katherine I. Riback, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Allegation that agency improperly evaluated awardee's proposal is denied where
             record establishes that the agency reasonably determined that awardee's proposal
             complied with the solicitation specifications.

             2. Technically unacceptable proposal cannot be considered for award regardless of
             potential cost savings to the government.
             DECISION

             Spectrum Control Systems, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Johnson
             Controls, Inc. under request for proposals (RFP) No. DACA 27-96-R-0063, issued by
             the Department of the Army, for the expansion of the Energy Monitoring and
             Control System (EMCS) at Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP sought proposals for installing heating ventilating and air conditioning
             (HVAC) control and monitoring equipment in 14 existing buildings, interfacing and
             connecting the new equipment to the existing EMCS system, and furnishing all
             necessary hardware and software to accomplish the expansion. The RFP
             contemplated the award of a firm, fixed-price requirements contract for a base
             requirement with several options. The solicitation set forth a 9,200-point
             technical/management evaluation scheme and provided that technical factors were
             more important than price in the award selection. The RFP stated that the agency
             would consider only the base requirement in evaluating price. The agency issued
             four amendments to the solicitation, two of which are relevant to this protest.
             Amendment No. 1 added drawings ME1 and ME3, and amendment No. 3 changed
             note 5 of drawing ME1 to the following:


1111227

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most