About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-275262.2 1 (1997-02-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaftw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548
Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

                                        A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                        and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                        version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                        involved for public release.


Matter of: Prospective Computer Analysts, Inc.

File:        B-275262.2

Date:        February 24, 1997

Kenneth D. Brody, Esq., McMahon, David & Brody, for the protester.
John R. Tolle, Esq., and Monica Gray, Esq., Barton, Mountain & Tolle, for Computer
Systems Development Corporation, an intervenor.
Theresa Chesnut, Esq., and Peter D. Butt, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the
agency.
Peter A. Iannicelli, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

The Navy may properly reopen negotiations after receiving best and final offers
where the Navy reasonably decided that further discussions are needed to resolve
whether offerors intend to pay minimum wage rates required by the Service
Contract Act.
DECISION

Prospective Computer Analysts, Inc. (PCA) protests the Navy's decision to reopen
negotiations with firms whose proposals were determined to be in the competitive
range under request for proposals (RFP) No. N00244-96-R-5142 for engineering and
technical support services. The protester contends that: (1) the Navy does not
have a valid reason for reopening discussions and soliciting a second round of best
and final offers (BAFO); (2) Navy officials improperly revealed PCA's proprietary
data to a competing offeror, Computer Systems Development Corporation (CSDC)
and, therefore, soliciting a second BAFO will result in a prohibited auction; and
(3) CSDC should be considered ineligible for contract award because it received
and was allowed to review a copy of the RFP before it was issued.

We deny the protest.

Issued on April 10, 1996, by the Fleet and Industrial Supply Center (FISC) as a total
small business set-aside, the RFP requested proposals for providing product
development and engineering and technical support services for various Navy
systems, including various aircraft, air combat electronic platform support
equipment, common support equipment, and aircraft carrier launch and recovery

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most