About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-274634 1 (1996-12-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaemq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Doty Bros. Equipment Company

             File:       B-274634

             Date:       December 19, 1996

             B. C. Brown for the protester.
             Christopher M. Bellomy, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
             Robert Arsenoff, Esq., and Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency improperly rejected low offer for failure to acknowledge a solicitation
             amendment where the agency has not identified how the amendment, which eased
             performance requirements, reflected a minimum need and thus how the amendment
             was material.
             DECISION

             Doty Bros. Equipment Company protests the rejection of its low offer under request
             for proposals (RFP) No. N68711-96-R-2220, issued by the Department of the Navy
             for the construction of a replacement jet fuel pipeline in Los Angeles County,
             California. The protester asserts that the contracting officer improperly rejected
             Doty Bros.' low offer for failing to acknowledge an immaterial solicitation
             amendment.

             We sustain the protest.

             The RFP, which was issued on August 8, 1996, and closed on August 20,
             contemplated a contract for a construction project to replace a jet fuel pipeline
             including excavation, construction of a new line and removal of the old line, and
             backfilling the excavated areas. Competition was limited to four offerors based on
             the agency's determination that an unusual and compelling urgency required such a
             restriction. Offerors were to submit a firm, fixed price for the project and provide a
             completed set of standard representations and certifications. The RFP advised that
             the agency intended to make award to the responsible offeror whose conforming
             offer was most advantageous to the government considering price and other factors
             specified in the solicitation without conducting discussions; no other factors were
             specified elsewhere in the solicitation, hence the agency awarded on the basis of
             low price.


3571219

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most