About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-274405.2 1 (1996-12-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaely0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548
Decision                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

                                         A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                         and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                         version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                         involved for public release.


Matter of: Pacific Architects and Engineers, Inc.

File:        B-274405.2; B-274405.3

Date:        December 18, 1996

Howell Roger Riggs, Esq., for the protester.
Stuart Young, Esq., and Cheralyn S. Cameron, Esq. for DynCorp, an intervenor.
Thomas J. Duffy, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
Katherine I. Riback, Esq., Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Although agency did not give protester an opportunity to comment on each
individual survey response regarding past performance, discussions were adequate
where agency identified multiple categories in which protester's past performance
was deficient and protester has not identified any other past performance areas
under which its proposal was downgraded.

2. Agency's cost realism analysis was adequate where the agency reasonably
considered the likely cost of awardee's performance, including a determination that
the awardee's proposed manning levels were adequate to perform the solicitation
tasking requirements.
DECISION

Pacific Architects and Engineers, Inc. (PAE) protests the Department of the Army's
award of a contract to DynCorp under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAHC92-95-
R-0132. PAE, the incumbent contractor, argues that the agency failed to conduct
adequate discussions, improperly evaluated its proposal, and failed to perform an
adequate cost realism analysis.'

We deny the protest.




1The protester initially raised other arguments that were the subject of a partial
dismissal earlier in this proceeding.


500124

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most