About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-271759 1 (1996-07-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaefx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                          and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                          version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                          involved for public release.


Matter of. Christie Constructors, Inc.

File:        B-271759; B-271759.2

Date:        July 23, 1996

Hiram S. Dillin, Esq., and David J. Bader, Esq., Dillin & Bader, Inc., for the
protester.
Justin P. Patterson, Esq., and James L. Weiner, Esq., Department of the Interior, for
the agency.
Andrew T. Pogany, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. In reviewing an agency's evaluation, the General Accounting Office will not
reevaluate proposals but instead will examine the agency's evaluation to ensure that
it was reasonable and consistent with the stated evaluation criteria. An offeror is
responsible for providing a full discussion of its technical approach and
methodology within the four corners of the proposal.

2. Protests based upon alleged solicitation improprieties which are apparent prior
to the time set for receipt of initial proposals must be filed prior to the initial
closing. Protesters do not have the option of simply making unilateral assumptions
regarding the meaning of conflicting or patently ambiguous provisions in a
solicitation and then expect relief when the agency does not act in the manner the
protester assumed.

3. In the absence of a timely objection to the solicitation's award methodology,
award may be made consistent with the agency's reasonable interpretation of the
request for proposal award provisions.

DECISION

Christie Constructors, Inc. protests the exclusion of its proposal from the
competitive range and the award of a contract to Dillingham Construction N.A., Inc.
under request for proposals (RFP) No. 1425-6-SP-20-03730, issued by the U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, California for the installation of a new spillway
gate and repair of seven other gates at Folsom Dam, California. The agency


53594

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most